SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes


 Home > News > Story

Published - Tuesday, May 13, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (7 comment(s))

County gives initial approval for Drug Court

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
Jackson County may soon have another court option for people charged with alcohol or drug related crimes.

The Jackson County Executive and Finance Committee gave preliminary approval Monday to provide $7,500 in start-up funds for a Drug Court. The money is a transfer from Teen Court, which recently received some additional funds for its programs.

The intent of Drug Court would be to provide alternative sanctions and assistance for people and save the county money at the same time.

Four Jackson County residents attended Drug Court Training in Portland, Ore. - Judge Gerald Laabs, Drug Court Coordinator Joni Thur, District Attorney Gerald Fox and Deputy Scott Bluedorn. Those four appeared Monday in support of the program.

"I was a prosecutor back in the early 1970s and now being judge, I've seen a huge change in that era to this era," Laabs said. "Back then people stole because they wanted money. Now almost 100 percent of our cases that we face deal with alcohol and drugs. That's why we think this is an alternative that will help the public and put people back into their jobs."

Fox said the intent of Drug Court is to intervene in people's lives and stop the underlying addiction that drives their criminal behavior. Just putting people in jail does not solve the problem and ends up costing more money because it results in lost jobs or a strain on other social services.

"The send them to jail model does not work," Fox said. Drug Court allows people to get treatment and support from their families, yet still holds them accountable, he said.

Public defender Bill Poss was emphatic that Drug Court will save the county money. "There's no ifs ands or buts about it," Poss said. Some of the savings comes from avoiding court-appointed attorneys' fees.

Thur cited the example of a recent third-offense drunken driving case, where the defendant went on to a fourth DWI conviction, resulting in jail costs for the county of $12,900 and alcohol treatment costs more than $10,000. Had that person been offered Drug Court, the cost would have been about $3,000, of which $1,000 would be borne by the offender.

All participants in Drug Court would be subject to much close monitoring and random testing and would agree to help pay for some of the costs through a phased-in plan that would help make it more affordable.

"We would start small and scale it up later based on our successes," Fox said.

All of the participants in the Drug Court are volunteering their time to help get the program started.

Fair park funding

When and how should the county provide funds for the Fair Park project was discussed by the committee. The county board in April approved paying up to $500,000 for the estimated $5.2 million Jackson County Fair Park renovation.

County legal counsel Mark Skolos told the committee that he would like to set up a meeting with the Fair Park board or some of its representatives to discuss the project.

The fairgrounds themselves are owned by the city of Black River Falls, which was determined several years ago after there was some confusion between the city, county and the Jackson County Agricultural Society, which has a lease to use the property.

Skolos said Carl Holmquist, who represents the Lunda Family Trust, wanted the county to consider joint ownership. That proposal was rejected by the committee, which unanimously voted to decline any ownership or maintenance responsibilities for the fair park.

Committee chairman Dennis Eberhardt said the county can protect its investment by having two members sit on the Fair Park board. Committee member William Cornell said he would like to see a project timeline so the county can schedule disbursements appropriately.

The committee voted to have Skolos set up a meeting to discuss the plan.
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

Missing Link wrote on May 20, 2008 2:45 PM:

" I can understand trying to develop programs to save tax dollars and attempt to help people with alcohol, drug, and other social problems.....from a politician's point of view. And there are really other people out there who sincerely want to help too. There is a missing link to the equation though. The person involved has to want to help themselves, or everyone else involved is just wasting their time and money. I believe a person is entitled to a second chance, but no more than that. I would support a program that offers alternatives/education in conjunction with punishment (at least a $3000 fine) for first time offenders who are under the influence, but the second time should be significant mandatory minimum jail time, that gets exponentially longer for any subsequent offenses. I also think the seizure and public sale of vehicles being used should be implemented after one offense, and I wouldn't be opposed to selling off the offender's other property to pay fines that are owed. I am not talking about 90 days, or six months, I'm talking starting out with at least a year, and going up from there. Yes, there will still be the alcoholics who will always drive drunk no matter what the consequences, but if the punishment is severe enough, it will keep them off the road longer, and deter a lot more people from taking the chance in the first place. To take it a step further, if we really want to keep people from driving under the influence, or dealing drugs, why don't we charge them with attempted manslaughter? I mean everyone knows that drunk driving and drugs kill people, so anyone involved should be prepared to face the punishment that goes with that. Yes, that would be a bit extreme, I am just trying to make a point, and in case you're wondering, I am far from a teetotalling, conservative. Several years ago, I served time after a second DUI, which was enough for me to learn my lesson. Unfortunately, there are too many people out there who don't care if they sit a few months in a county jail, especially if they get let out to go to work every day. It's sad to say, but ultra severe punishments coupled with programs designed to educate people before they offend are the only ways I can see that will make any significant impact on these or any other crimes (don't even get me started on violent crimes). Yes, there is already overcrowding in our prison system, and increasing sentences would add to that.....at first. But if the penalties are severe enough, there would be an eventual decline in crime and incarcerations in general. Look at the state of Virginia for instance. If you're caught going just 10 mph over the speed limit there, it is a $2500 fine, up to a year in jail, plus (for residents), an additional $1050 in driver's license taxes. I don't imagine there are a whole lot of people out there who care as much if they are a little late getting to Jr's soccer game. If we take this type of hard nosed approach, there would be an immediate, noticeable decline in whatever crime we want to target. "

Just another thought...... wrote on May 19, 2008 11:53 PM:

" I totally get people's concerns/questions about drug court. It can seem like a far out there concept. I'm only trying to encourage people to contact those who are a part of the planning team and talk to them about there concerns and ask questions before jumping to conclusions about the program. "

To Just a thought wrote on May 17, 2008 11:55 AM:

" I am pretty open minded about a LOT of issues. This is America and we may do as we please as long as it does not infringe on the rights of others, or cause harm. I am NOT open minded about people killing and injuring people on the highways. I am NOT open minded about people abusing thier families. I am NOT open minded about people putting my and YOUR life in danger. I do not fear change... As long as that change enhances the safety of the citizens. The reason the hard line approach does not work is that it is NOT ALLOWED to work. Plea agreements... Sob stories, people hiding behind their families. Nope, Not going for it. If a person does not go to work or does not do the job he or she was hired to do, they get FIRED (unless your the Judge, the DA or any other politician that is). "Innovative approaches"... Right... Ohhhh K. Look at how those innovative approaches have stripped away parents rights to raise thier children. The home is whare it ALL begins. The teaching of right from wrong. Those inovative approahes that allow the miscreant children to run amok. Our innovative approaches have failed. The fact is that a person WILL NOT change unless that person has a GOOD REASON to do so. Treatment can only work if the person has a reason and a true desire to change. Punishment can work if allowed. I do understand that my views are a little right wing, however I am frustrated at the current status quo. Coddling MULTIPLE offenders and "innovative approaches" only gives avenues for that offender to use and abuse the system. A simple approach is always the best. I do wrong... I get punished and I think "nope, I don't wanna do THAT again" or better yet... "Nope, I don't wanna do that the FIRST time because I WILL BE PUNISHED". On another note., "Inovative approaches" allows an offender to live his or her life AFTER punishment... After he or she has killed or injured a person for life. Those who are victimized must live with the knowlege that those who have taken their loved one(s) from them are ALIVE and well, free to pursue life, liberty and happiness. Do you have any of those "innovative approaches" to help those victimized rather than "helping" those who kill? "

Just a thought....... wrote on May 15, 2008 11:03 PM:

" I just don't understand how people think throwing a person in jail/prison for drunk driving works as effective treatment or a deterrent from future violations. If that was true wouldn't it make sense that there would be no 3rd, 4th, 5th violations because the individual would have learned something from going to jail at their 2nd offense. Drug Court is a innovative approach to a horrible problem that every county is dealing with. As a community we should try to keep an open mind to new ideas instead of fearing change. I bet any of the individuals that helped bring a Drug Court to Jackson County would be more than willing to answer any questions citizens may have about this program. "

SHAKE wrote on May 14, 2008 1:55 PM:

" The first response has merit but , the person does not clearly understand anything about chemical dependency Because, when it was mentioned that the writer did not enjoy "paying for the family and problems of the children" this writer does not understand that chemical dependency always has and always will affect, and most of the time destroy families. There is factual statistics and writing pointing out that prison does not treat the disease of addiction. And if this person is so "for" punishment, what about this 5th offense drunk driving law we have, that is a joke. In essence, the treatment/prison pendulum (in regards to Federal and initiative funding) has swung towrd prison and has not swung back for almost 20 years. So...Is it really helping????, Nah, I think we will just build maybe 4-7 more prisons in Wisconsin next year. Maybe that will do it. It is really easy to find the costs of THAT!!!!! "

What the. wrote on May 14, 2008 11:50 AM:

" this "Drug Court" thing is a bleeding heart liberal adjenda... PERIOD. The system works just fine thank you IF ALLOWED TO WORK. the system, as I understand it, is as follows. #1, the police stop a suspected drunk driver or make contact with a drug user/seller. #2, the person meets the requirements of probable cause and is arrested. #3, the person goes to court. #4, is found guilty or not guilty... If found guilty is punished, if not guilty, set free. If a person looks at the record of Judge Laabs and DA Fox, you will find a lot of plea agreements. What gives with that?. "Awwwwww, the person with the multiple drunk driving offenses or drug arrests needs help". BULL. The judical system is sooooooo worried that a criminal may loose his or her job. Awwwwww, my heart bleeds for those people. the system can and should be boiled down to one simple philosophy and that is If ya can't do the time DON'T DO THE CRIME!. Who worries about us?, the citizens who do not drink and drive or use/sell drugs?, or commit the associated crimes, such as robbery, theft, assaults etc ect. About costs... I would rather spend my HARD EARNED tax dollar on punishment of those people. I am not talking about the person who smokes a little weed... I am talking about the people who sell drugs to KIDS. I am talking about the people who live off the public dole who use, abuse and sell drugs. Look at costs associated with medical care to some... a LOT of those people. WE PAY for those medical costs because a lot of those people WITH KIDS!!! do not have jobs and live off US. They sure as HELL do or did not care about thier families while commiting those offenses and they did or do not care about the rest of us, who are trying to do right. The system should be simple... The punishment should fit the crime... Operative word PUNISHMENT. Look what is happening all over the country after the bleeding heart "let's help these people" liberals got thier hands into the syetem... School shootings... A rise in deaths on the highways, escalating gang activities etc, etc etc. Time for that crap to stop. Back to basics. We are going to have to spend money anyway and I would rather spend money on a system that people would NOT want to enter... That being the prison system, rather than a "awwwwwww, lets give that person one more chance and more treatment" system... One that he or she can laugh about and continue to party it up... At OUR EXPENSE!. I am so sick of reading about deaths associated with drunk driving and drugs and those people being slapped on the wrist and laugh their collective asses off over it, while the rest of us work hard and try to live decent and get the financial shaft or worse... killed or injured by those associated with alcohol or drug related crimes. "

Jaxx wrote on May 14, 2008 5:44 AM:

" It is about time that Jackson County has a drug court! Good job to everyone who has been involved with bringing Drug Court to Jackson County and thank you! "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Jackson County Chronicle.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The Jackson County Chronicle, please sign in now!
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, Jackson County Chronicle requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2009 The Jackson County Chronicle. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.